Random solutions

(Cosmogony)

How then are we to act, given our ambiguous origin and mysterious conclusion. Keeping in mind that the seed of our existence is indefinite, we must acknowledge the significance of random events. Recalling also that we are the cause of all our perceptions, perhaps the best solutions are those we make the least (while also the most, given their required interpretation) investment in seeking. Allowing ourselves to flow with the metaphysical instincts of the SR we may discover a constant truth.

A.

An Aardvark was taken aback with an abacus and abandoned the Abalone. Forgetting his companion beneath the waves he began to rely on none, until one day he was found lost in the desert. The Aardvark consulted his abacus but the numbers gave no indication of where he might quench thirst.

The desert contains many ants (living in their hills where the Aardvark hunts them with his tongue).

The random solution is usually the most linguistically colorful. The story above serves as a cosmogony. It takes its origin in the beginning of language, quite literally. The first entries in the Merriam Webster Dictionary are;

1. A,
2. aardvark,
3. aback,
4. abacus,
5. abalone, and
6. abandon.

This order will be referred to as direct, the story will be called abstract. Elements of direct will be referred to by number, ie. 4 = abacus.

The first line of the abstract is derived from direct's sequence with a few modifications and the addition of CFs. The sharpest discrepancy between the abstract order and the initial one is the placement of 6 before 5. This contradiction does not, however, deny an etymological survey of the first four elements.

A is the first, and until the intersection with a second, A is the entire system. A is modified with N as An, this allows another alliteration, as well as a second word also beginning with A. It should be noted here that in construction N forms the border between the first and second group of abstractions . Also N separates A from aardvark. Thus N asserts itself as a divider between first and second abstractions in constructed and random solutions.

In the direct, the first instance of a second letter being anything other then A comes in 3. In 1 only the first letter is considered. In 2 the first two letters are the same. In 3, aback, we consider the first three letters and here appears something other than A, a B. Also the meaning of the third calls for us to have arrived at some point (different from the initial point) and to be returning to an earlier point as a result. This is reflected in the first three letters. After 3 develops B as a second element in the sequence it takes itself back to the first element A (repeated as the third letter)

At 4 we include the fourth letter in our analysis, a C. It seems what was once nothing but A became impure in 2, yet even in 2 the first two are A. In 3 the second is a B, and as is reflected by 3's meaning the third in 3 is again A. 4 introduces yet another new element C, in the fourth position. The meaning of 4 is a tool used for counting.

It has been said "that which can be counted we perceive." That which can not be counted exists imperceptibly. It is as if once the aardvark discovered the capacity of reason, he estranged himself from nature of his origins. This presents an appropriate allegory to the human condition.

The act of 6 isolates 5. The past is left behind and the name of the mollusk is a-(and)-b-alone. The exploration initiated by a second (the result of the first division) goes so far that we are lost. The bipeds have forgotten what is most important, that a-(and)-b-(are)-al(l)-one.

B.

Another example of the fury with which the patterns of creation manifest appeared one afternoon as I flipped through a dictionary of Japanese to English. The order of the words as they revealed themselves was-

1. Chief
2. Sun
2.9 of
3. Shrine
4. Moon
5. Go
6. Visit

They were reordered as, sun chief go visit shrine of moon. This of course requires hirigana (CFs) to be proper Japanese. Yet the hieroglyphics for these words serves as an interesting cosmogony.


It begins of course with what from a distance appears as a point. The point is in fact hollow and forms a spherical loop. In cross section (examination) it is a circle, "the egg a symbol of life" (Beastie Boys). The loop evolves into a triangle. It could be a pyramid, the final resting place of the great chiefs. It is well known that the lower levels of a pyramid contain the most secret passages, while the upper contain the most technology. Likewise, the Herodianic Greek counting system uses a capital delta (triangle) to signify ten. Thus we must consider the second symbol as indicated an exponential evolution. The first clearly has a value of one (though it looks like a zero), the second is not two, but ten.

The third is `go', an arrow indicating the direction of progress. The fourth and center symbol is `visit'. Visit also means river in certain hieroglyphics (dependent on context). In both cases there is constant change, this then is the equaling principle. The shrine symbol is fifth and looks exactly like the first letter (pi) of the greek word pente (five). This is a building which is the symbol of man.

The initialization (sunlight necessary for perception) sends forth its chief purpose- to go towards the center, passing through (flowing through, or visiting) the balanced fourth, it enshrines purpose (as men cling to the past) and continues to conclusion. The end is the reflection of the beginning, with part blotted out by progress.

The sixth symbol is a CF. Likewise it indicates a potential infinity before the end is reached. The sixth symbol is this wedge of ambiguity between a devoted (encapsulated [enshrined]) flow from center towards conclusion, this is another example of the curse (hex) of reason.

The evolution of the first symbol is expounded with in the "1.{". It displays progressing zoom. 3/3 When viewed from a distance appears smaller and blurs into what looks like l. Just as the point preceding l is the sun hieroglyph viewed from a distance. Unfortunately the point does not enlarge at the same rate as the fraction, this explains the disparity of perspective between the image and the description.

The most significant aspect of this description then, is the point. The point enlarges and travels (as physicists and the river tell us, in waves). Then after entrenchment and encapsulation, becomes (through the process of potentially infinite detail [the number six is a spiral similar to the Japanese word]) the capacity to acknowledge another point (so the light from the sun lets us perceive the moon).

C.

Where now is the root of our sometime negligence to construct? Clearly there have been those who build from the bottom. Consensus however, seems to be that events must proceed in the direction of previous entrenchment. That is not the case. Using the point to contradict itself, it is possible (after displaying potential for the unlikely) to pull belief in an unanticipated direction.

The dinosaurs evolved into the Alien-esque creatures in Antarctica. They were the result of continued reptile evolution during the ice age. As the world warmed, they found they could only tolerate the sub-zero climate of the retreating ice caps. Today all that remain live in Antarctica. They have brainwashed the result of mammalian evolution into believing the north pole is the top of the world. This was done to ensure that Humans would disregard the bottom.

D.

The first degree most often obtained by students is the BA. This teaches us, among other things, BC -> AD. This is built upon our familiarity with ABCD... As such it appears that the era BC. is encapsulated in AD. This supports the theory that the past is constructed as the present passes. If the writings attributed to the Pythagoreans are actually contemporary, then ABCD is a more fundamental order than BC-AD. Of course the latter is abbreviation. Interpreting potential abbreviates is not asking for answers, It is closer to begging. Of course Beggars Can't Be Choosers, is B.C.B.C. This seems to indicate that the past is repeated. In any case the most common phrase of CB jargon is "ten four", similarly, 10-4 are the numbers most expounded upon by Pythagoreans, be they what they may. Often it is possible for the segments separated by a comma, to have a meaning independent of the whole sentence. ie. In the spirit of questions, why do you ask? This is a concept along the same lines as subtext, particularly in dialogue.

Conclusion-

Religious people call @ god. Call it @, and we are the creators of our destiny (Andignostic). Call it god and you believe in fate, predetermination, and acquiescent behavior (Andignastic).

A trend of potentially infinite tangents does not eliminate the likelyhood of a loop. The necessity of random solution, it is the only kind possible. Decreasing time wasted increases synchronization with coincidence.

"What is the difficulty of the human condition?" If we are capable of asserting an effective force upon our destiny, why isn't Earth an enlightened utopia yet? To address this penultimate question is the concluding Platonian Justiposition, based primarily upon Timaeus (37c-39e).

"Human Suffering is caused by false assumptions based on random events." (uw3.c)

Perceiving time is the era of assumption.
The following demarcated statement is false;
*I say Plato imagined himself conversing with a human representative of Time.*
However, excepting it as a premise allows us to draw the following conclusions:

What is true, Plato through Timaeus says, is that discussion is imprecise. The discussion regards a pattern which by nature includes Time.

Detail and generality provide two avenues for infinite discussion. Time's relation to the pattern is confined within a loop. The parameters of this confinement are flexible according to the subject.

Taking for a subject the sun, as a man born of Earth shines light in which we perceive. We see ourselves "through the mirror of my mind" (the Supremes). Upon examination of the bodies reflection we find it to be as the vessel of self.

Skeptically do we enshrine the subject of self in this 'self image'. Freudian analysis of dreams leads us to indicate images of a house (or construction) as representing said body. In religious observation this structure is sacred. "Man is five (the devil is six and god is seven)" (The Pixies), as "alive, a shrine brought into being for the everlasting gods" (Tim. 37d), and "Number five is alive!" (Short Circut).

"Five Alive" (citrus beverage) demonstrates as we construct our argument regarding subject we support, with clips from the pattern of global discourse. We build these shrines for what purpose? To elevate self, or grow (evolve) through incorporation into self of other subjects. Indeed to incorporate the heavens in ones subject matter (as is traditional among planetarians). Discussion of heaven is often tinted (tainted) with religious observance.

Scientific observance is theoretically withdrawn. It advocates careful experimental observation and construction. Religious observance is potentially involving. It sings for adherents and links self with heaven in unlikely constructs. Of special importance to religious observers is tradition and its entrenchment. Observance in either case involves fabrication.

// Notion of numbers inc. +-*/. sig of oneness.

As for the remainder, where I enshrined them, and for what reasons-if one should explain all these, this account though only by the way, would be a heavier task than that for the sake of which it is given.

Back to the adventure-